1
0
mirror of synced 2026-04-30 05:35:57 +00:00
Files
Interlisp.medley/internal/gabriel/Results/Lyric/summary.tedit

84 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
The Performance of the Lyric Common Lisp Compiler
vs the Byte Compiler on selected Gabriel Benchmarks
3/18/87
The Gabrile IO benchmarks (Fprint, Fread, Tprint), and the Gabriel polynomial benchmarks were not included (will be dealt with separately). Traverse-init and Traverse were dropped because the circular structure created by traverse-init cloggs the garbage collection hash tables and renders timings for that benchmark (and subsequent benchmarks) not reproducable.
All results are for an 1186 with 3.7 MB running the lispcore sysout of 12-MAR-87.
Full transcripts are available on:
{eris}<lispcore>gabriel>results>tak-pav.benchmarks
{eris}<lispcore>gabriel>results>tak-byte.benchmarks
{eris}<lispcore>gabriel>results>all-pav.benchmarks
{eris}<lispcore>gabriel>results>all-byte.benchmarks
The Tak Family of Benchmarks:
Benchmark Lyric-CL(secs) Byte(secs) Ratio
Tak 1.79 1.63 1.10
Takr 1.84 1.74 1.06
Stak 12.69 4.59 2.76 (1)
Takl 15.52 13.37 1.16
Ctak 55.67 96.82 0.57 (2)
(1) The Byte Compiler benefits from an optimization not implemented in the Lyric Common Lisp Compiler
(2) Although the Lyric Common Lisp compiler does better on Ctak than the Byte compiler, Lyric-compiled Ctak conses (due to an Mvlist) -- this could be optimized away.
The Aref'y Family of Benchmarks:
Benchmark Lyric-CL (Cpu) Byte (Cpu) Ratio (Cpu)
Puzzle 48.18 48.18 56.60 56.60 0.85 0.85
Triang 783.74 783.27 743.32 742.71 1.05 1.05
FFT 186.69 81.20 195.58 87.47 0.95 0.93
The Cons'y Family of Benchmarks:
Benchmark Lyric-CL (Cpu) Byte (Cpu) Ratio (Cpu)
Div2-I 35.45 12.62 29.14 8.94 1.22 1.41
Div2-R 39.14 14.93 34.66 13.42 1.13 1.11
Destruct 21.37 15.00 21.31 15.39 1.00 0.97
Deriv 70.35 25.23 64.70 21.57 1.09 1.17
DDeriv 83.87 31.88 77.02 28.14 1.09 1.13
Boyer 141.22 101.76 143.74 103.58 0.98 0.98
Browse 589.84 323.96 912.23 634.4 0.65 0.51
Browse* 310.64 192.93 384.12 269.42 0.81 0.72 (1)
(1) Browse* is a modified version of the browse benchmark which uses an implementation of the char1 macro that doesn't cons.
Comparison with Koto Interlisp Benchmarks
The koto results were compiled last year on an 1186 with 3.7MB running the vanilla Koto full.sysout with cmlarray loaded. The Koto benchmarks were implemented in Interlisp.
Benchmark Koto-I (Cpu) Lyric-CL (Cpu) Ratio (Cpu)
Tak 1.69 1.69 1.79 1.79 0.94 0.94
Takr 1.77 1.77 1.84 1.84 0.96 0.96
Stak 4.36 4.36 12.69 12.69 0.34 0.34
Takl 12.6 12.6 15.52 15.52 0.81 0.81
Ctak 55.1 55.1 55.67 49.3 0.99 1.12
Puzzle 114.0 114.0 48.18 48.18 2.37 2.37
Triang 2170.44 2170.0 783.74 783.27 2.77 2.77
FFT 825.0 660.0 186.69 81.20 4.42 6.10 (1)
Div2-I 30.21 9.51 35.45 12.62 0.85 0.75
Div2-R 33.7 12.6 39.14 14.93 0.86 0.84
Destruct 18.82 12.8 21.37 15.00 0.88 0.85
Deriv 61.5 21.9 70.35 25.23 0.87 0.87
DDeriv 80.1 31.8 83.87 31.88 0.96 1.00
Boyer 100.10 63.4 141.22 101.76 0.71 0.62 (2)
Browse 300.0 174.0 589.84 323.96 0.51 0.54 (3)
Browse* 300.0 174.0 310.64 192.93 0.96 0.90 (4)
(1) FFT speed up largely due to microcode support for Floating point arithmetic.
(2) Boyer conses compiled-closures in Lyric
(3) Koto figures not avaiable for 1186 -- Published 1108 values used instead. Symbol-name conses string headers in Lyric.
(4) An implementation of browse that avoids use of Symbol-name=ø`œä h¤=ø`¨ð8È7øxðh°Fø <x´ð,h¤àGACHA
GACHA
GACHA
hlS$3434*f§!0)-(!0()+(),,2}*­2"#%%$).+('*&'./0Q,z> ¦zº