github.com/PDP-10.klh10
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/PDP-10/klh10.git synced 2026-02-06 16:35:39 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
71 Commits 10 Branches 4 Tags
8aff8084ffbae79a5ce63292eac96b005edd695f
Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Olaf Seibert
03be37db7c Add initial VDE (libvde2) support. 
I have compile-tested this on a virtual FreeBSD 10.2 but not run it.
 2016-01-21 23:50:27 +01:00
Olaf Seibert
0ac7cd4cdb Attempt a replacement for pcap_set_immediate_mode() if missing. 2016-01-20 20:17:31 +01:00
Olaf Seibert
2ac5184ff2 Add a configure script and remove a tangle of frail #if conditions 
This only uses autoconf, not automake or libtool or intltool or whatever.
This also allows easy building of different emulators in different build directories.

I have tested TOPS-20 with pcap|tap+bridge, ITS with pcap|tun|tap+bridge, both on NetBSD and Linux
and hopefully everything still works after the fine-tuning.
 2016-01-19 23:41:49 +01:00
Olaf Seibert
e23aaab39a Add a few dependencies. 2016-01-08 01:12:33 +01:00
Olaf Seibert
34559748e5 Remove SIOCGIFCONF in favour of getifaddrs(3) or pcap_findalldevs(3). 
Use the result from those functions in preference to looking it up again.
Looking up of ethernet addresses remains unportable.
 2015-12-18 14:06:28 +01:00
Olaf Seibert
37cbb5150b Merge branch 'mmcm-tuntap' because it didn't break on NetBSD. 2015-07-27 23:06:42 +02:00
Olaf Seibert
75c47c9842 Rename the build executable for ITS to kn10-ks-its. 
That should hopefully make it easier to install all versions in parallel
in the same directory, with less duplication.
 2015-07-22 00:31:27 +02:00
Olaf Seibert
13ec237e67 Merge branch 'master' into mmcm-tuntap 
Merged these small conflicts:
	src/dpni20.c
	src/osdnet.c
	src/osdnet.h
Compile-tested on NetBSD and Linux, but not run-tested.
 2015-07-22 00:02:26 +02:00
Olaf Seibert
0fdbb8f017 Patch applied. No conflicts. 
klh10$ patch -p1 <tuntap.patch
Hmm...  Looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** klh10-2.0h/bld/lnx86/00build       2005-02-22 02:47:02.000000000
|-0500
|--- klh10-2.0i/bld/lnx86/00build       2005-09-10 01:05:48.000000000
|-0400
--------------------------
Patching file bld/lnx86/00build using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** klh10-2.0h/src/dpimp.c     2003-02-23 13:07:35.000000000 -0500
|--- klh10-2.0i/src/dpimp.c     2005-09-11 10:14:55.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file src/dpimp.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 279.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 501.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 563.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 573.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 637.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 695.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 709.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1755.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** klh10-2.0h/src/dpimp.h     2001-11-19 05:45:49.000000000 -0500
|--- klh10-2.0i/src/dpimp.h     2005-08-16 20:05:22.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file src/dpimp.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 106.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** klh10-2.0h/src/dpni20.c    2003-02-23 13:07:50.000000000 -0500
|--- klh10-2.0i/src/dpni20.c    2005-09-09 20:50:47.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file src/dpni20.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 177.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 388.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 456.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 491.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 506.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1463.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1531.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1543.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** klh10-2.0h/src/dpni20.h    2001-11-10 16:29:01.000000000 -0500
|--- klh10-2.0i/src/dpni20.h    2005-08-16 20:05:22.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file src/dpni20.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 52.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -r -c --exclude='*.orig' --unidirectional-new-file
|klh10-2.0h/src/dvlhdh.c klh10-2.0i/src/dvlhdh.c
|*** klh10-2.0h/src/dvlhdh.c    2001-11-19 05:47:54.000000000 -0500
|--- klh10-2.0i/src/dvlhdh.c    2005-08-16 20:05:22.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file src/dvlhdh.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 103.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 172.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 303.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1066.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** klh10-2.0h/src/dvni20.c    2001-11-10 16:29:03.000000000 -0500
|--- klh10-2.0i/src/dvni20.c    2005-08-16 20:05:22.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file src/dvni20.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 157.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 295.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 393.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 720.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** klh10-2.0h/src/Makefile.mk 2005-02-22 02:16:14.000000000 -0500
|--- klh10-2.0i/src/Makefile.mk 2005-08-16 20:05:22.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file src/Makefile.mk using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 302.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** klh10-2.0h/src/osdnet.c    2005-04-28 18:01:04.000000000 -0400
|--- klh10-2.0i/src/osdnet.c    2005-09-11 11:12:41.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file src/osdnet.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 812.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1131.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1162.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1225.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1616.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1633.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1691.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1721.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1817.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** klh10-2.0h/src/osdnet.h    2001-11-19 05:34:01.000000000 -0500
|--- klh10-2.0i/src/osdnet.h    2005-08-16 20:05:22.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file src/osdnet.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 69.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 146.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 382.
done
klh10$
 2015-07-21 23:37:45 +02:00
Olaf Seibert
79e1a9e898 Add a build note for strange error 
"[DTE: Bad to-10 BP 442200,,733000][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left:
4086][dte_10xfrbeg: out of data, no I bit]"
 2015-04-27 23:34:34 +02:00
Olaf Seibert
58b59dbaa1 Overlay panda-dist/klh10-2.0h 
by the late MRC, Mark Crispin.
Source: probably the former http://panda.com/tops-20/ .
panda-dist.tar.gz dated Mar 30  2007.
 2015-04-27 23:07:21 +02:00
Olaf Seibert
742b43d025 Initial import of klh10-2.0a.tgz 
dated Nov 19  2001.
Source: http://klh10.trailing-edge.com/
 2015-04-27 22:54:12 +02:00